Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by legislation." It truly is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents with the boy or girl usually do not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they can do if they are able to Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.
The ruling with the first court created case legislation that must be followed by other courts until eventually or Except if either new law is created, or perhaps a higher court rules differently.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the moment petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and private respondents and will just take care of every one of the aspects of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Just a few years in the past, searching for case precedent was a tricky and time consuming task, necessitating persons to search through print copies of case law, or to pay for access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case law search alternatives, and many sources offer free access to case law.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support in the Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. Because the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. Read more
We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed with the Constitution and laws in the United States and this State.
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf in the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for just a dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Positions with DCFS.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their click here service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as a foster child. Although the pair had two younger children of their possess at home, the social worker did not inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to your court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement while in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair had younger children.
Given that the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are recognized by executive organizations based on statutes.